Stop paying your taxes! Taxes upon labor (income taxes) are forbidden by Constitutional law. There is no law in existence saying we need to pay them. Rather, the opposite is true: paying taxes on labor/income aids and abets traitorous organizations – the I.R.S. and the Federal Reserve, which are operated by foreign agents to the Republic and exist only to hoodwink and swindle the American taxpayer. Instead file 1099 A, B, and OID forms and recover your lost monies in the banking scheme times 10 (total of ALL bank deposits for the year x 10)!
Likewise, you do not owe property taxes, as evidenced in the below-cited case:
In Wheeling Steel Corp v. Fox , 298 U.S. 193 (1936) it states: Property taxes can be on
tangibles or intangibles. In order to have a situs for taxation (a basis for imposing the tax), tangible property (physical property) must reside within the territorial jurisdiction of the taxing authority.
Know your rights. Quit living in fear. Reap your true reward – claim your true estate!
Also, California Motor Vehicle Code Section 260 says:
Private cars/vans etc. not in commerce / for profit, are immune to registration fees:
(a) A “commercial vehicle” is a vehicle of a type
REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code”.
(b) “Passenger vehicles which are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation or
profit, and housecars, are not commercial vehicles”.
(c) “a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.”
This is likely standardized for all 50 states, as statutes are not true law. A Private Automobile is NOT required to be registered by Law!
‘‘Motor vehicle’’ means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property and cargo; … “Used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit[.]” 18 U.S.C. 31. A Private Automobile is NOT required to be registered by Law!
Under USC Title 42 §1982. Property rights of citizens …, further evidences the above position that the City or State cannot take land because they DO NOT have Jurisdiction. It states that federal or state governments / agencies MUST have a monetary or proprietary interest in your real private property in order to have jurisdiction over it (if your land has no government grant/funding or is not a subsidized government project, then agencies have neither). DEMAND any public servant/said agencies to provide the legal document that allows any federal or state agency to supersede and/or bypass Title 42 USC §1982 and/or §1441. Title 42 §1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights … further protects Declarant’s private property.
The State cannot diminish rights of the people. Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516. This means free, unalienable, God-granted rights to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and unrestricted travel. Looks like you’re SOL, Homeland Security and TSA screeners!
“Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law.” In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100. This means Mr. Police officer, lawyers and judges better know their stuff. If you know better, you gain the upper hand and they lose.
“The government is but an agency to the state,” — the state being the sovereign people. State v. Chase, 175 Minn, 259, 220 N.W. 951, 953. Translation? Government and all its agents work for YOU/WE, the people.
“…The Congress cannot revoke the Sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.” Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935). This means your will overrides government and congress!
“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.” Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp. 94. Police officers violating this maxim of law face punishment under U.S.C. Title 18, Sec. 241 and 242, et al. If wrongly detained by an officer of the peace/law, demand they identify themselves with 3 forms of ID. If they cannot or will not, then cease interacting with them. If they continue to be hostile, demand to speak to their hazard bond underwriter. They forfeit their hazard bonds for threats, intimidation, or assault while under color of law. To wit:
When officers detained appellant for the purpose of requiring him to identify himself, they performed a seizure of his person subject to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment… The Fourth Amendment, of course, applies to all seizures of the person, including seizures that involve only a brief detention short of traditional arrest… Whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has ‘seized’ that person, and the Fourth Amendment requires that the seizure be ‘reasonable’.
“But even assuming that purpose (prevention of crime) is served to some degree by stopping and demanding identification from an individual without any specific basis for believing he is involved in criminal activity, the guarantees of the Fourth Amendment do not allow it.”
“The application of…(a code)…to detain appellant and require him to identify himself violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers lacked any reasonable suspicion to believe appellant was engaged, or had engaged, in criminal conduct. Accordingly, appellant may not be punished for refusing to identify himself, and the conviction is reversed.” (Probable cause) Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, (1979) Cite this case when being wrongly detained as well. You as a free citizen with unalienable rights ARE NOT bound by law to show them any identification.
Phoenicianbard's Weblog 